2017新GRE写作官方题库Argument全题解析汇总(61)

>>GRE写作：2017新GRE写作官方题库Argument全题解析汇总(61)

>>GRE考试辅导：精品课程高端指导

GRE官方题库原题61

The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities.

"Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast-food warehouse in Palm City, but last month we discovered that over $20,000 worth of food there had been destroyed by pest damage. Meanwhile, the Buzzoff Pest Control Company, which we have used for many years, continued to service our warehouse in Wintervale, and last month only $10,000 worth of the food stored there had been destroyed by pest damage. Even though the price charged by Fly-Away is considerably lower, our best means of saving money is to return to Buzzoff for all our pest control services."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

题目翻译

最近我们和Fly-Away Pest-Control公司签订了一项合同来为我们在Palm City的快餐食品仓库提供杀虫服务，但上个月我们发现，那里有价值超过$20000的食品被害虫破坏。同时，我们使用多年的Buzzoff Pest-Control公司继续在Wintervale的仓库服务，上个月那里只有价值$10000的食品被害虫破坏。尽管Fly-Away的收费低廉的多，我们节省收费的最好方式就是重新使用Buzzoff公司来提供我们所有的杀虫服务。

题目分析

1. 作者没有提供足够的证据证明Buzzoff的效果比Fly-Away Pest-Control Company好，可能过去Buzzoff在这个地区效果更差。

2. 作者也没有提供详细的信息说明这两个公司的价格各是多少，如果差价很高，则还是应当选Bezzoff。

3. 其他因素：没有说明这两个公司的其他服务，比如是否会对损害的食物进行补偿，是否有其他增值服务。

提纲参考

1. 没有证据证明$20,000的损失是很多的。Inflation & devaluation。P应该和自己以前比，而不是和W比。

2. 没有证据证明B是有效的，可能W东西少，破坏率高。样本差异，即使B在W有效，在P未必有效。

3. 没有证据证明减少的损失能够弥补费用。

关注坦途网GRE考试频道，写作高分之路就在这里！同时，如有疑问可以直接咨询，我们会为您解答一切疑问。