2017新GRE写作官方题库Argument全题解析汇总(22)

>>GRE写作：2017新GRE写作官方题库Argument全题解析汇总(22)     >>GRE考试辅导

GRE官方题库原题22

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper.

"In our region of Trillura, the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend—the city-run public schools—comes from taxes that each city government collects. The region's cities differ, however, in the budgetary priority they give to public education. For example, both as a proportion of its overall tax revenues and in absolute terms, Parson City has recently spent almost twice as much per year as Blue City has for its public schools—even though both cities have about the same number of residents. Clearly, Parson City residents place a higher value on providing a good education in public schools than Blue City residents do."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

题目翻译

在Treehaven地区的每个城市，政府用于公立学校教育的开支大部分都是从政府征收的税收而来的。然而，该地区不同城市对公共教育的重视程度是不同的。举例而言，Parson市用于公立学校的预算通常是Blue市的两倍，尽管两城市居数量基本相同。因此，Parson市的居显然比Blue市居更关注公立学校教育。

题目分析

论断：P城的居民比B城更关心公立学校的教育。P城每年拨到公立学校的财政经费是B城的两倍，尽管两个城市的居民人数相同。

·B城收入可能比P城少五倍，这样他的教育经费所占的比例是P城的近三倍。

·P城的学生是B城的四倍，每个学生摊到的是只有B城的一半。 ·钱花得多不一定就更关心，政府的态度与居民的态度不一定一致。

提纲参考

1. 预算钱数不能反映重视程度。样本差异。应该比较在预算中占的比例。

2. 居民数量一样不说明学生数量一样。

3. 预算只是一部分，其他方式重视教育。

想要拿下GRE写作高分？关注坦途网GRE考试频道，权威写作解析正在继续！