GMAT

GMATGMAT写作写作范文文章

2019年GMAT考试必看经典写作满分范文2

2019年08月07日 19:59:27来源:GMAT考试网
导读:作文是我们从小就一直接触的考试部分,但是我们也不能掉以轻心,在平时的备考训练中注意对素材的积累,今天小编给大家准备了GMAT考试写作范文,一起来看看吧!

写作中很多同学苦恼于自己缺乏写作素材能力方面的积累,写不出一些比较有格调的高分句式。而考试本身对于作文句式方面的多样性也有一定要求。因此,主动参考学习并合理运用一些写作范文是及其有必要的,今天小编就给大家准备了这篇范文,在坦途网GAMT考试频道还有很多相关的内容和GAMT考试时间,快点来看看吧!

The following appeared in the editorial section of a campus newspaper.

“Because occupancy rates for campus housing fell during the last academic year, so did housing revenues. To solve the problem, campus housing officials should reduce the number of available housing units, thereby increasing the occupancy rates. Also, to keep students from choosing to live off-campus, housing officials should lower the rents, thereby increasing demand.”

校园报纸的社论:

因为校园住宅的使用率在过去的学年中下降了,住宅收入也下降了。为了解决这个问题,校园住宅办公室应该减少可使用的住宅单元,从而增加使用率。同样的,为了不让学生选择住在校外,住宅办公室应该降低租金来扩大需求。

1, 入住率低可能是因为学生人数减少等原因造成的

2, 同时减少供给和降低房费可能会抵消入住率提高而带来的收入提高效应而有余

3, 就算不会完全抵消仍然有其他原因影响收入例如说学生进入后的维修等等。

boosting rental maintenance oppressive seriousness trivailize

1, 忽略他因:单纯地说问题所在是rent. 但实际上可能有很多其他的因素:房子的condition, security, cleaning service,noisy surroundings等等。

2, 过去不能推广到未来:很可能变化了——比如enrollments of students have sharply increased。所以,很可能减少available的数量可能不是合适的做法。

3, 减少提供的房子,降低房租,很可能导致收入下降。

The author of this article argues that, to reverse declining revenues from campus housing rentals, campus housing officials should decrease the number of available housing units and reduce rent prices on the units. The author’s line of reasoning is that fewer available units will limit supply while lower rents will increase demand, thereby improving overall occupancy rates, and that the resulting increase in occupancy rates will, in turn, boost revenues for the campus. This reasoning is unconvincing for several reasons.

To begin with, the author assumes that boosting occupancy rates will improve revenues. All other factors remaining unchanged, this would be the case. However, the author proposes reducing both the supply of units and their rental prices. Both of these actions would tend to reduce revenues. The author provides no evidence that the revenue-enhancing effect of a higher occupancy rate will exceed the revenue-decreasing effect of reduced supply and price. Without such evidence, the argument is unconvincing.

Secondly, the author assumes that lowering rents will lead to higher revenues by increasing demand. However, it is possible that demand would decrease, depending on the extent of the rent reduction as well as other factors—such as overall enrollment and the supply and relative cost of off-campus housing. Moreover, even if demand increases by lowering rents, revenues will not necessarily increase as a result. Other factors, such as maintenance and other costs of providing campus housing units and the reduced supply of rental units might contribute to a net decrease in revenue.

Thirdly, in asserting that lowering rental rates will increase demand, the author assumes that current rental rates are causing low demand. However, low demand for student housing could be a function of other factors. For instance, the student housing units may be old and poorly maintained. Perhaps students find the campus housing rules oppressive, and therefore prefer to live off-campus; or perhaps enrollments are down generally, affecting campus housing occupancy.

In conclusion, the author of this editorial has not argued effectively for a decrease in the number of available campus housing units and a reduction in rental rates for those units. To strengthen the argument, the author must show that a rent reduction will actually increase demand, and that the revenue-enhancing effect of greater demand will outweigh the revenue-reducing effect of a smaller supply and of lower rental rates.

以上就是小编为大家准备的全部内容了,想要做好阅读题考得高分,就要在平时多做一些模拟题,积累一些相关的素材和技巧,小编在坦途网更新了很多素材和技巧,有需要的同学可以去看看哦!小编还会为大家实时更新GMAT考试时间,希望能帮助大家顺利通过考试!

温馨提示:因考试政策、内容不断变化与调整,坦途网提供的以上信息仅供参考,如有异议,请考生以权威部门公布的内容为准!

GMAT培训课程免费试听

预约免费体验课

教育顾问会第一时间安排您的体验课!

课程预约立即提交
最新文章
电话咨询在线咨询资料领取