19年ACT阅读题型讲解之对比题
>>ACT考试技巧:19年ACT阅读题型讲解之对比题
一、ACT阅读题型之对比题考查形式
(1) 小说类型的文章。在小说类型的文章中,主要考察关于人物之间性格特点或者与人物相关的事件的对比。
(2) 非小说类型的文章。在非小说类型的文章中,主要考察关于文章中涉及到的不同观点之间的比较。
二、ACT阅读题型之对比题提问方式
The distinction between …and ...is that:
三、ACT阅读题型之对比题答题技巧
做这类题的时候注意与题目相关的原文中涉及到的表示转折或者表示不同观点的词语,例如:but, different,,however,in contrast, nevertheless,,whereas,,while,,on the other hand,,some...others,,different等。
四、ACT阅读题型之对比题真题解析
Three decades later,Swedish chemist and Nobel laureate Svante Arrhenius agreed, but he took issue with part of Kelvin’s scenario. The fiery trauma of a meteoroid ejected from a planet or out of the solar system, he argued, would incinerate any cells it harbored. Instead of hitching rides within rocks, Arrhenius said, life could travel unaided. In 1903, he proposed that spores of plants and germs might drift through space propelled by the gentle pressure of starlight. He called this idea panspermia ( from the Greek for“seeds everywhere”).
Based on lines 35-40,the distinction between Kelvin’s scenario and Arrhenius’s argument is that:
A.instead of hitching rides within rocks, Arrhenius said life could travel unaided.
B.our ancestor cells must have been created within our own planetary system or in a nearby sister system bom at the same time.
C.life vagabonds through the cosmos.
D.if at the present instant no life existed upon this earth, one such stone falling upon it might lead to its becoming covered with vegetation.
解析:这道题对Kelvin和Arrhenius的观点进行了比较。与Kelvin的“生命是凭借一定的媒介来传播”的观点不同的是,Arrhenius认为“生命可以自行传播,不需要辅助”。对应原文中的答案是“Instead of hitching rides within rocks, Arrhenius said, life could travel unaided.”
上面就是针对阅读细节题的详细讲解,相信同学们通过上面的内容,应该已经理解了阅读对比题有哪些特点了。请考生们及时关注ACT考试时间,根据时间来制定备考计划,按照计划针对性的复习。相信最后一定会有个好结果的,还想了解更多就来坦途网ACT考试频道咨询吧!
温馨提示:因考试政策、内容不断变化与调整,坦途网提供的以上信息仅供参考,如有异议,请考生以权威部门公布的内容为准!
- 你不得不知的ACT考试写作小妙招06-19
- ACT考试阅读应该怎么正确找到作者的目的05-05
- ACT考试阅读应该怎么理解作者的态度05-05
- ACT考试阅读应该怎么对文章进行推论05-05